COMPARE

Dakera vs Qdrant

Both Dakera and Qdrant are written in Rust and offer gRPC + REST APIs. But they solve different problems: Qdrant is a high-performance vector search engine with advanced filtering, while Dakera is a memory engine that uses vector search as one component of a broader memory system.

Feature Comparison

FeatureDakeraQdrant
CategoryAI Agent Memory EngineVector Search Engine
LanguageRustRust
Vector SearchHNSW (part of hybrid retrieval)HNSW with custom modifications (highly optimized)
Full-text SearchBM25 built-in, fused with vector via RRFFull-text index (basic, not BM25-level)
FilteringMetadata filtering on recallAdvanced payload filtering (nested, geo, range, match)
RerankingOn-device cross-encoderNot built-in
Memory Decay6 strategiesNot available
SessionsFull session managementNot available (collection-level only)
Knowledge GraphEntity extraction, BFS traversalNot available
QuantizationNot currentlyScalar, Product, Binary quantization
Multi-vectorSingle embedding per memoryNamed vectors (multiple per point)
DistributedSingle-node focusNative sharding + replication
EmbeddingOn-device ONNXBring your own (FastEmbed optional)
SDKsPython, TypeScript, Go, RustPython, TypeScript, Go, Rust, Java, C#
APIsREST + gRPCREST + gRPC
LicenseMIT SDKs, proprietary serverApache 2.0

Architecture Differences

Dakera

A memory-first engine where HNSW vector search is one retrieval path. Queries go through hybrid retrieval (BM25 + vector), Reciprocal Rank Fusion, and cross-encoder reranking. On top of search, Dakera adds memory semantics: decay (memories fade over time), importance scoring, sessions, namespaces, and knowledge graphs. The architecture prioritizes memory intelligence over raw vector throughput.

Qdrant

A purpose-built vector search engine optimized for performance at scale. Qdrant's HNSW implementation includes custom optimizations for high throughput and low latency. Its standout feature is the advanced filtering system — nested conditions, geo-spatial queries, and payload indexes allow complex queries without sacrificing performance. Native support for sharding, replication, quantization (scalar/product/binary), and named vectors makes it production-ready at massive scale.

Deployment Model

AspectDakeraQdrant
Self-hostedSingle binary (Docker, K8s, systemd)Single binary (Docker, K8s, Helm)
CloudComing soonQdrant Cloud (managed, multi-region)
ClusteringSingle-node primaryNative distributed mode (shards + replicas)
StorageEmbedded (self-contained)Disk-optimized with mmap + WAL
SnapshotsExport/importNative snapshot + recovery

Pricing Comparison

TierDakeraQdrant
Open SourceSelf-hosted free (MIT SDKs)Fully open-source (Apache 2.0)
Self-hosted$0 + infrastructure$0 + infrastructure
CloudComing soonFrom $0.025/hr (1GB RAM node) on Qdrant Cloud

When to Choose

Choose Qdrant if:

Choose Dakera if:

Verdict

Dakera delivers a complete agent memory engine — hybrid BM25 + HNSW vector search with cross-encoder reranking, 6 memory decay strategies, knowledge graphs with GLiNER extraction, AES-256-GCM encryption, and 83 MCP tools — all in a self-hosted 44 MB Rust binary scoring 87.6% on LoCoMo. Qdrant is one of the best vector search engines available — its Rust performance, advanced payload filtering, and native clustering make it excellent for large-scale similarity search and recommendation systems. Choose Dakera when your AI agents need memory with sessions, decay, and knowledge graph reasoning. Choose Qdrant when you need a blazing-fast, horizontally-scalable vector store with advanced filtering for RAG or recommendations.

Try Dakera Free

Memory engine with hybrid retrieval, decay, and knowledge graphs — built in Rust like Qdrant, but designed for agent memory.

Get Started